The debate, held on October 25th, 2023, was a pivotal moment in the race, with both candidates vying for the attention of the American public. The debate was a clash of ideologies, with Trump advocating for a more traditional approach to governance, while Harris presented a more progressive vision. Trump’s stance on issues like immigration, healthcare, and climate change was met with skepticism from many, particularly among younger voters. His rhetoric on these issues, often characterized as divisive and inflammatory, resonated with a segment of the electorate, but failed to convince a broader audience.

The debate was a significant step forward for Harris, and it was a good performance.”

This view is shared by many analysts and experts, including those at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and other major financial institutions. These institutions are closely monitoring the race and are likely to be heavily influenced by the debate’s outcome. The debate’s impact on the race is significant, as it has shifted the momentum towards Harris.

The debate, held on October 25th, 2023, saw the candidates engage in a heated exchange of ideas, showcasing their contrasting views on key issues such as the economy, foreign policy, and social issues. The debate was widely viewed as a turning point in the race, with analysts predicting that it would significantly impact the outcome of the election. The debate’s impact on the race is still being assessed, but early indications suggest that it has indeed shifted the balance of power in favor of one of the candidates.

This suggests that investors are anticipating a shift in the US political landscape, with a potential for more stringent immigration policies and a focus on renewable energy. **Key Takeaways:**

* **Correctional Facility Operators:** The stock of operators of correctional facilities, including GEO Group and CoreCivic, has declined. This decline is likely due to a potential shift in US immigration policies, which could lead to a decrease in the number of inmates and, consequently, a reduction in the demand for correctional facility services.

* **Harris’ Potential Impact on Treasury Prices:**
* **Reduced Deficit Risk:** Harris’s emphasis on fiscal responsibility and a more moderate approach to government spending could potentially reduce the risk of widening budget deficits. This could lead to a more stable and predictable environment for Treasury bond investors, making them more willing to buy Treasury bonds, thus pushing prices up. * **Lower Interest Rates:** A Harris presidency could potentially lead to lower interest rates overall. This is because a more moderate approach to government spending could reduce pressure on the Federal Reserve to increase interest rates to control inflation.